It would be nice if students who have complaints about the Union would come and talk to the elected officers about them to see how they can be rectified. That is, after all, what we are here for.
Nothing sickens me more than seeing people such as Mr Boot, who have made no effort to get involved with how the Union is run (eg elections, or speaking up at OGMs) stirring up contempt for the Union, which is only trying to do a good job for its members.
Mr Boot emailed me a little while ago complaining that we had games on our website, amongst other things. He also said (and I quote) ‘don’t even get me started on how you run your commercial services’ to which I asked him to clarify what he meant. I got no response, so I presume Mr Boot has no real concerns at all and enjoys stirring wherever possible.
This is highlighted by the way he has gone about producing the ‘Scandal’ headline on the front page of yourstudentvoice. A number of months back, the SU officers met with Mr Boot and the rest of the yourstudentvoice team to discuss how the two sites could work alongside each other. It was accepted at this meeting that the official SU site would, for obvious reasons, have commercial content (how do people think we make money to put into services to members?) while yourstudentvoice would be the independent voice, so to speak. So I am somewhat hurt that Mr Boot has chosen to handle his opinions in such an inappropriate way instaed of airing them first with the Union, who he knew was happy to co-operate.
I do think Mr Boot made one or two valid points, but at the end of the day, if you don’t like the Terms and Conditions, the don’t sign up (I notice Mr Boot was happy enough to do so). I don’t think its draconian to ask people not to be racist, homophobic etc. I’ve seen the comments that were removed – they talk about nuking coloured people in Iraq – people should be able to log onto their Union website without having to read that. As for asking for mobile numbers, well perhaps it shouldn’t be compulsory, but we’re only doing it to keep you in touch with what’s going on at the Union………and what’s wrong with that?
Above all, I ask any student who has a concern about the Union to either come and see us, or get involved in the democratic processes and get it changed!
I’m still waiting to hear from Mr Boot why exactly he thinks we ‘bodge up’ most of our ‘useful services’
John Goodwin, UHSU President.
My reply to Mr Goodwin:
First of all, let me say I did in fact attempt to email you, but the email bounced. In fact rather a lot of emails into the Uni have been bouncing recently, which seems to look like a widespread misconfiguration of the email servers on campus. Aren’t the IT guys great?
I was involved with the paper for a long time in my first and second years, and found it extremely disheartening that real issues involving the Union or the University were edited out before publication. Some of the stories themselves were enough to make me feel ill (including comments about how Ordinary Members of the Finance Committee were pressured into voting certain ways on various issues). This does not make me feel that my concerns will be acted upon. Add to the mix that I hadn’t heard that the elections were running at all until I was accosted by candidates on the last day of voting while on my way to a meeting at Uni. And OGMs? I never hear about those unless my various Societies pressure me to turning up to make up the quorum. Is this a way to run a democratic organisation?
When I wrote in commenting on the site, I didn’t write complaining about games: I just found that the games and horoscopes didn’t bring any extra value to the site. Games and horoscopes won’t make me any more likely to visit the site in the slightest, so why bother having them? I can very easily find higher quality games and horoscopes through a simple search engine. But that’s a very minor issue.
As for the running of commercial services provided by the Union: you asked for it, you’re going to get it. As we all know the Union runs a shop, a bar, and a catering service. We’ll start with the bar. As we all know, prices at the bar are being steadily pushed up and up. Before I started, most pints were Â£1.00. When I started, Â£1.20. This year: Â£1.25 and up. In my first year there was a rewards scheme (the Gold Card) and 99p Wednesdays, among other promotions (Spank yer Monkey! yeah!). This year: none! And you expect students, who are already skint, to keep paying more and more for the same cheap lager? No, they’ll go to other bars which are increasingly lowering their prices and giving special offers. And just a few months ago, it was headline news that students weren’t going to ‘The Venue’. And how about that pillar in front of the stage?
I know someone who used to work weekends in the café of old. What I found most interesting about the shop and café at Milton Hall was while they were both on the same level, and had about and equal distance from the door, they would sell the same food items at different prices. For instance, if you just wanted a bottle of Coke it was usually cheaper from the Café, but the shop had that meal deal on. The café never provided the best food, but it was always good enough and cheap. When the new building came along, for some reason it was decided the shop would gain the prime spot downstairs, and the café get the larger plot upstairs, which all sounds great until you think of the details. Since the shop sells sandwiches and other sorts of food, nobody is going to go up that massive flight of stairs to go and buy something upstairs, are they? I mean, if you wanted a paper you’d easily do the journey, since if you’ve got time to read a paper you have time to walk up some steps. Not so for a sandwich. If you only have 10 minutes between lectures, running upstairs to get a sarnie and a cup of tea is not an option. Also, a large part of the charm of Milton was being able to order a full english and have a pint with it. Now you have to carry the bugger downstairs, since you’re not allowed booze upstairs (which is fair enough as the Union has long needed to take into account Muslim and other students who want to eat outside a boozy/smokey environment). Apparently this has had so much of an impact that weekend catering at the Union has been discontinued, and that’s a story in itself. The cowards who run the place didn’t have the guts to sack this person face to face, preferring to send merely a P45 in the post without any explanation.
The Scandal headline was posted for obvious reasons: I had posted some comments about the Union that I wanted heard by the world: officers of the Union and other people. Instead of getting any response of any kind, the Union preferred to cover up my issues by deleting the comments I had made. Is that fair? I think not, therefore the headline. And yes we did meet, and we did have what seemed like very productive meetings. Then everything stalled. Nothing has happened between HSV and the Union since our last meeting. But this has nothing to do with Huddersfield Student Voice, this is a personal issue between the Union and myself and I simply chose to air it on Huddersfield Student Voice (as well as my own site). Simple as that. It should not matter that I am an HSV ‘staffer’.
Of course it’s not draconian to ask people not to be racist, and I’m not complaining about the removal of such comments in any way–I would expect this to happen. What I was complaining about is that you threaten to give people’s personal details away if they make a fuss! I am very pleased that you eventually deleted those racist comments, but while it took you less than half an hour to delete my ‘whingeing’, it took over 24 hours to delete the racism–and that was only done once I had drawn attention to it. And there’s nothing wrong with asking for my phone number, but at least let me refuse to give it to you…
If you want students to get involved in the democratic process, let them know what is happening in the first place!